Schizophrenia Research Forum - A Catalyst for Creative Thinking
Home Profile Membership/Get Newsletter Log In Contact Us
 For Patients & Families
What's New
Recent Updates
SRF Papers
Current Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Conference News
Forums
Current Hypotheses
Idea Lab
Online Discussions
Virtual Conferences
Interviews
Resources
What We Know
SchizophreniaGene
Animal Models
Drugs in Trials
Research Tools
Grants
Jobs
Conferences
Journals
Community Calendar
General Information
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
History
SRF Team
Advisory Board
Support Us
How to Cite
Fan (E)Mail
The Schizophrenia Research Forum web site is sponsored by the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation and was created with funding from the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health.
Research News
back to News Search
     
SIRS 2012—Immunology Takes Center Stage

4 May 2012. At the 2012 Schizophrenia International Research Society meeting in Florence, Italy, the Tuesday, 17 April, plenary talks focused on roles for the immune system in schizophrenia. The packed audience, combined with several related symposia, suggested that the topic has moved beyond fringe status in research attention. The idea that the immune system somehow contributes to the development of schizophrenia stems largely from epidemiology, which has consistently revealed associations between the disorder and risk factors that can be seen through an immunological lens, such as winter birth, urban birth, and maternal infection during pregnancy. Several talks highlighted the importance of verifying findings with immunological markers such as antibodies or inflammation-related molecules like cytokines in blood samples, which might also help shed light on the immune system’s actions in the brain.

Though maternal infection during pregnancy is a prominent example of an immune-related risk factor for schizophrenia, Preben Mortensen of Aarhus University, Denmark, cited recent evidence from his group that this risk may be part of a more general familial susceptibility to infection itself, as infections in fathers and hospitalizations due to infection also contributed to schizophrenia risk in a recent study from his group (Nielsen et al., 2011). This doesn’t rule out a specific effect of maternal infection, however, and in an attempt to understand how that might happen, he described a candidate gene approach in which infection of a pregnant mother with herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2)—verified by blood samples—was considered in combination with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes for N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, which may be underactive in schizophrenia. This revealed that HSV-2 infection during pregnancy modulated the risk conferred by specific SNPs (Demontis et al., 2011), and genomewide analysis of SNPs and how their risk is modulated by maternal infection with cytomegalovirus is now underway.

Whether the infectious agents themselves somehow increase risk, or the body’s reaction to them does, is a major question for research into the immune system’s involvement in schizophrenia. Noting that physical illness can trigger or worsen psychiatric symptoms, Barbara Sperner-Unterweger of the Medical University Innsbruck, Austria, focused on the body’s own immune response. She reviewed evidence for increased cytokines in schizophrenia and depression, and noted that specific molecules may mark acute psychosis, whereas others reflect an underlying trait (Miller et al., 2011). Sperner-Unterweger described how cytokines have consequences in the brain by influencing the kynurenine pathway that modulates neurotransmitter signaling, but making definitive links is complicated by the fact that cytokines also vary according to a person’s health.

The long arm of maternal infection
Alan Brown of Columbia University, New York, detailed his work exploring a connection between maternal infection and schizophrenia. Verifying infection through archived samples of maternal blood available in the Childhood Health Development Study (CHDS) cohort, he has found that having the flu during the first half of pregnancy or infection with Toxoplasma gondii (the parasite residing in the cat’s litter box), increases risk for schizophrenia in offspring (Brown et al., 2004 and Brown et al., 2005). These exposures are also associated with poorer executive function in adults with schizophrenia (Brown et al., 2009), and Brown described new work in which worse performance on several cognitive measures, including working memory, was associated with low birth weight among schizophrenia cases. Though birth weight might seem a coarse measure, Brown said it could serve as a proxy for disruptions to brain development caused by prenatal infection, which could then be reflected by neurocognitive measures in adulthood.

The risk associated with maternal infection may not be specific for schizophrenia. In a symposium on Sunday, Brown presented unpublished work, also based on the CHDS birth cohort, in which maternal exposure to influenza—based on a physician’s diagnosis rather than on blood samples—produced a fourfold increase in risk for bipolar disorder. He suggested that timing might be important, where infection later in pregnancy tilts risk toward bipolar disorder, and earlier infection tilts toward schizophrenia.

In a symposium later that afternoon, Åsa Blomström of the Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, reported the first replication of Brown’s maternal blood toxoplasmosis finding, and extended the risk-associated factors to cytomegalovirus for the first time. Using archived neonatal blood spots from a Danish biobank containing 3.5 million samples, Blomström assessed prenatal exposure to T. gondii, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and herpes simplex viruses (HSV-1 or HSV-2) by measuring maternal antibodies to these pathogens. Higher-than-usual levels of antibodies to T. gondii and CMV were associated with schizophrenia compared to controls, with odds ratios of 2.1 and 2.2, respectively.

Later in life
In a Sunday symposium, Faith Dickerson of Sheppard and Enoch Pratt Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, examined a role for retroviruses in schizophrenia. Retroviruses are RNA viruses that can infect the nervous system, and our genome contains endogenous retroviruses that embedded themselves into the DNA of our ancient ancestors. There they lie dormant, until an acute infection or immune response reactivates them. Retroviruses have come under suspicion in schizophrenia because they reside in chromosomal regions that overlap with areas implicated in the disorder, and previous research in small schizophrenia samples has found aberrant retrovirus expression in the blood, cerebral spinal fluid, and postmortem brains.

Dickerson presented results from a large study in which she examined the blood in cases of schizophrenia (n = 163 recent onset, n = 268 multi-episode) and controls (n = 235). She reported an increased level of antibodies to two of these, murine leukemia virus (muLV) and Mason-Pfizer monkey virus, in recent-onset cases of schizophrenia, but not in the chronic cases or in the controls. The blood samples of these participants were negative for retrovirus RNA, ruling out an acutely occurring retroviral infection. Dickerson also described a new longitudinal study of mania, with preliminary results finding an increase in antibodies to feline immunodeficiency virus in the blood of people when they were admitted to the hospital for mania symptoms. The increases were still present a few days later, but not six months later; antibodies to muLV were increased at all three time points.

Modeling mechanisms
In the same symposium, Mikhail Pletnikov of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, described research focused on understanding the effect of infectious pathogens on the brain in mouse models, and found that timing may matter. He reported that T. gondii infection of mice in early adolescence (4.5 weeks), but not in adulthood (nine weeks), led to hyperactivity and sensitivity to NMDA receptor blockade, features used for modeling schizophrenia in animals. Pletnikov pointed out that T. gondii has a tyrosine hydroxylase homolog which could influence catecholamine synthesis in the brain. But it remains to be seen whether these altered mouse behaviors reflect direct action of the parasite in the brain, or stem from immune system activation against the parasite.

In the same symposium, Dorothy Schafer of Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, outlined some possibilities of how immune system activation may sculpt the brain’s networks. She focused on the immune system's complement cascade molecules C1q and C3, which have an unexpected role in synaptic pruning (Stevens et al., 2007). Schafer presented mouse data suggesting that these molecules tag weak synapses between retinal ganglion cells and lateral geniculate neurons for removal, and that microglia then recognize these tags and come to engulf the synapses, disposing of them as though they were pathogens. Though there is some evidence for abnormal microglia activation in schizophrenia (Garey, 2010), the specific involvement of the complement cascade in the disorder is so far unclear.

The return of MHC
During the Tuesday plenary session, Peter McGuffin of Kings College, London, U.K., gave a primer on a molecule that has helped revive interest in the immune system in schizophrenia—the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). Over three decades ago, McGuffin’s work into the genetic basis of schizophrenia led him to the region of chromosome 6 containing the MHC—a 3.6 Mb region containing 140 genes, half with immune system function like complement system molecules and cytokines. This lead eventually fizzled out, but MHC is now making a comeback, given the latest GWAS, which finds signals in the region (see SRF related news story). The region is a Pandora’s box of variability, making it difficult to pinpoint the exact location of the association signal, and McGuffin wagered that there is a 50-50 chance that it is immune related.—Michele Solis.

 
Comments on Related News
Related News: GWAS Goes Bigger: Large Sample Sizes Uncover New Risk Loci, Additional Overlap in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

Comment by:  David J. Porteous, SRF Advisor
Submitted 21 September 2011 Posted 21 September 2011

Consorting with GWAS for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: same message, (some) different genes
On 18 September 2011, Nature Genetics published the results from the Psychiatric Genetics Consortium of two separate, large-scale GWAS analyses, for schizophrenia (Ripke et al., 2011) and for bipolar disorder (Sklar et al., 2011), and a joint analysis of both. By combining forces across several consortia who have previously published separately, we should now have some clarity and definitive answers.

For schizophrenia, the Stage 1 GWAS discovery data came from 9,394 cases and 12,462 controls from 17 studies, imputing 1,252,901 SNPs. The Stage 2 replication sample comprised 8,442 cases and 21,397 controls. Of the 136 SNPs which reached genomewide significance in Stage 1, 129 (95 percent) mapped to the MHC locus, long known to be associated with risk of schizophrenia. Of the remaining seven SNPs, five mapped to previously identified loci. In total, just 10 loci met or...  Read more


View all comments by David J. Porteous

Related News: GWAS Goes Bigger: Large Sample Sizes Uncover New Risk Loci, Additional Overlap in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

Comment by:  Patrick Sullivan, SRF Advisor
Submitted 26 September 2011 Posted 26 September 2011
  I recommend the Primary Papers

The two papers appearing online in Nature Genetics last Sunday are truly important additions to our increasing knowledge base for these disorders. The core analyses have been presented multiple times at international meetings in the past two years.

Since then, the available sample sizes for both schizophrenia and bipolar disorder have grown considerably. If the recently published data are any guide, the next round of analyses should be particularly revealing.

The PGC results and almost all of the data that were used in these reports are available by application to the controlled-access repository.

Please see the references for views of this area that contrast with those of Professor Porteous.

References:

Sullivan P. Don't give up on GWAS. Molecular Psychiatry. 2011 Aug 9. Abstract

Kim Y, Zerwas S, Trace SE, Sullivan PF. Schizophrenia genetics: where next? Schizophr Bull. 2011;37:456-63. Abstract

View all comments by Patrick Sullivan


Related News: GWAS Goes Bigger: Large Sample Sizes Uncover New Risk Loci, Additional Overlap in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

Comment by:  Edward Scolnick
Submitted 28 September 2011 Posted 29 September 2011
  I recommend the Primary Papers

It is clear in human genetics that common variants and rare variants have frequently been detected in the same genes. Numerous examples exist in many diseases. The bashing of GWAS in schizophrenia and bipolar illness indicates, by those who make such comments, a lack of understanding of human genetics and where the field is. When these studies were initiated five years ago, next-generation sequencing was not available. Large samples of populations or trios or quartets did not exist. The international consortia have worked to collect such samples that are available for GWAS now, as well as for detailed sequencing studies. Before these studies began there was virtually nothing known about the etiology of schizophrenia and bipolar illness. The DISC1 gene translocation in the famous family was an important observation in that family. But almost a decade later there is still no convincing data that variants in Disc1 or many of its interacting proteins are involved in the pathogenesis of human schizophrenia or major mental illness.

Sequencing studies touted to be the Occam's...  Read more


View all comments by Edward Scolnick

Related News: GWAS Goes Bigger: Large Sample Sizes Uncover New Risk Loci, Additional Overlap in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

Comment by:  Nick CraddockMichael O'Donovan (SRF Advisor)
Submitted 11 October 2011 Posted 11 October 2011

At the start of the millennium, only two molecular genetic findings could be said with a fair amount of confidence to be etiologically relevant to schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. The first of these was that deletions of chromosome 22q11 that are known to cause velo-cardio-facial syndrome also confer a substantial increase in risk of psychosis. The second was the discovery by David St Clair, Douglas Blackwood, and colleagues (St Clair et al., 1990) of a balanced translocation involving chromosomes 1 and 11 that co-segregates with a range of psychiatric phenotypes in a single large family, was clearly relevant to the etiology of illness in that family (Blackwood et al., 2001). The latter finding has led to the conjecture, based upon a translocation breakpoint analysis reported by Kirsty Millar, David Porteous, and colleagues (Millar et al., 2000), that elevated risk in that family is conferred by altered function of a gene eponymously...  Read more


View all comments by Nick Craddock
View all comments by Michael O'Donovan

Related News: GWAS Goes Bigger: Large Sample Sizes Uncover New Risk Loci, Additional Overlap in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

Comment by:  Todd LenczAnil Malhotra (SRF Advisor)
Submitted 11 October 2011 Posted 11 October 2011

It is worth re-emphasizing that efforts such as the Psychiatric GWAS Consortium do not rule out potentially important discoveries from alternative strategies such as endophenotypic approaches or examination of rare variants. Indeed, such strategies will be necessary to understand the functional mechanisms implicated by GWAS hits.

Moreover, we note that the two recently published PGC papers were not designed to exclude a role for previously identified candidate loci such as DISC1 (Hodgkinson et al., 2004), or prior GWAS findings such as rs1344706 at ZNF804A (Williams et al., 2011). For both these loci, and many others that have been proposed, meta-analysis of available samples suggest very small effect sizes (OR ~1.1), as might be expected for common variants. As noted in Supplementary Table S12 of the schizophrenia PGC paper (Ripke et al., 2011), the currently available sample size (~9,000 cases/~12,000 controls) of the discovery cohort was still underpowered to detect variants...  Read more


View all comments by Todd Lencz
View all comments by Anil Malhotra

Related News: SIRS 2012—Psychological and Social Treatment for Schizophrenia

Comment by:  Lewis Kirshner
Submitted 18 June 2012 Posted 20 June 2012

The field seems to be cautiously returning to look seriously at psychotherapeutic approaches. Paying attention to forms of cognition and affect has been a traditional form of therapy, and it seems foolish to ignore the clinical experiences of its many practitioners, despite conceptual problems of past work. We also have the benefits of studies indicating the effects of trauma on subsequent psychosis and developmental research on attachment and language that may mediate early neglect or trauma. Problems in development of TOM in insecure attachment may point to specific vulnerabilities.

References:

Berry K, Barrowclough C, Wearden A. Attachment theory: a framework for understanding symptoms and interpersonal relationships in psychosis. Behav Res Ther . 2008 Dec ; 46(12):1275-82. Abstract

Fonagy P, Target M. Playing with reality: I. Theory of mind and the normal development of psychic reality. Int J Psychoanal . 1996 Apr ; 77 ( Pt 2)():217-33. Abstract

Heins M, Simons C, Lataster T, Pfeifer S, Versmissen D, Lardinois M, Marcelis M, Delespaul P, Krabbendam L, van Os J, Myin-Germeys I. Childhood trauma and psychosis: a case-control and case-sibling comparison across different levels of genetic liability, psychopathology, and type of trauma. Am J Psychiatry . 2011 Dec ; 168(12):1286-94. Abstract

Lysaker PH, Outcalt SD, Ringer JM. Clinical and psychosocial significance of trauma history in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Expert Rev Neurother . 2010 Jul ; 10(7):1143-51. Abstract

Read J, Gumley J. Can attachment theory help explain the relationship between childhood adversity and psychosis? Attachment New Directions in Psychotherapy. Relational Analysis. 2008;2:1-35.

View all comments by Lewis Kirshner

Submit a Comment on this News Article
Make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Affiliation  
Country or Territory  
*Login Email Address  
*Confirm Email Address  
*Password  
*Confirm Password  
Remember my Login and Password?  
Get SRF newsletter with recent commentary?  
 
Enter the code as it is shown below:
This code helps prevent automated registrations.

Please note: A member needs to be both registered and logged in to submit a comment.

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


SRF News
SRF Comments
Text Size
Reset Text Size
Email this pageEmail this page

Share/Bookmark
Copyright © 2005- 2013 Schizophrenia Research Forum Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright